Athletics: 100m: what is the fastest possible time?

At the recent World Championships in Athletics held in Japan, the most anticipated 100m race of the year took place. It was a duel between the world’s greatest sprinters, a clash of titans Tyson Gay and Asafa Powell, both unbeaten this season. Gay clocked the fastest time this season at 9.84 and Powell is world record holder, having clocked 9.77s not once but 3 times since 2005.

Many people expected the world record to fall due to the intense rivalry between the two superstars and the fast track, but what happened instead was Gay, even though he became world champion, did not even equal his personal best and Powell disappointingly faded to finish third. Powell’s excuse: “I just tightened up and panicked. I felt Tyson coming and panicked. During the rounds I felt fine but I made a huge mistake in the final and it cost me the race.”

If Gay’s time is only 0.02 seconds faster than Carl Lewis’ mark set 16 years ago, how fast can humans ever run the 100m?

In April 1996 in El Paso, Texas, Obadele Thompson ran the fastest 100 m race ever, at the incredible time of 9.69 seconds. However, it was achieved with the following wind in excess of 5 m/s, well over the IAAF legal limit of 2.0 m/s, and the mark was not officially recognized. Still, that was the fastest ever time a human has been timed to run a 100m race, legal or not.

Well, how about a legal race then? If we look at the perfect race, i.e. the best 10m splits in history (as of August 2006), the time would come up to be even more incredible: 9.46 seconds (source quoted at bottom):

This list has undergone dramatic change as I have included split-times from Gatlin’s 9.77=WR in Doha earlier this year. Kim Collins’ 1.67 0-10m Minus RT is taken away as it was an estimate split-time that I gave for him in my 2004 Athens OG 100m Final Analysis

Also, with the inclusion of Gatlin’s new best time of 0.85 from 30-40m Mo Greene & Asafa lose their shares of the best split in that section.

Reaction Time [RT] Limit: 0.100

•0-10m: 1.69 [Minus RT], Raymond STEWART [9.96 Tokyo WC 91], Frankie FREDERICKS [9.86 Lausanne GP 96], Maurice GREENE [9.79WR Athens GP 99 & 9.82 Edmonton WC 01] [Note: 1.69, also by Ben JOHNSON 9.79 Seoul OG 88 DQ & Tim MONTGOMERY 9.85 Edmonton WC 01 DQ]

•10-20m: 1.00, Bruny SURIN [9.84 Sevilla WC 99] & Maurice GREENE [9.82 Edmonton WC 01] [Note: 1.00s, also by Ben JOHNSON 10.15 Roma WCH SF 1987 DQ]

•20-30m: 0.89, Maurice GREENE [9.87 Stockholm GP 99]

•30-40m: 0.85, Justin GATLIN [9.77=WR Doha GP 06]

•40-50m: 0.84, Carl LEWIS [9.86WR Tokyo WC 91], Frankie FREDERICKS [9.86 Lausanne GP 96] & Maurice GREENE [9.93 Lausanne GP 99] [Note: 0.84, also by Ben JOHNSON 9.79 Seoul OG 88 DQ & Tim MONTGOMERY 9.78 Paris GPF 02 DQ]

•50-60m: 0.82, Maurice GREENE [9.85 Roma GP 99, 9.86 Berlin GL 00 & 9.87 Sydney OG 00]

•60-70m: 0.83, Donovan BAILEY [9.93 Lausanne GP 96) & Maurice GREENE [9.86 Berlin GL 00, 9.87s Sydney OG 00 & 9.82 Edmonton WC 01]

•70-80m: 0.83, Carl LEWIS [9.86WR Tokyo WCH 91] & Maurice GREENE [9.86 Berlin GL 00 & 9.87 Sydney OG 00]

•80-90m: 0.85, Carl LEWIS [10.03 Roma WCH SF 87, 9.93WR Roma WC 87, 9.97 Seoul OG SF 88 & 10.02 Stuttgart WC 93], Maurice GREENE [9.79WR Athens GP 99, 9.80 Sevilla WC 99 & Sydney OG 00], Asafa POWELL [9.77WR Athens GP 05 & 9.77=WR Gateshead GP 06] & Justin GATLIN [9.77=WR Doha GP 06] [Note: 0.85, also Tim MONTGOMERY 9.78 Paris GPF 02 DQ]

•90-100m: 0.85, Carl LEWIS [9.99 Los Angeles OG 84 & 10.02 Stuttgart WC 93], Maurice GREENE [9.79WR Athens GP 99], Asafa POWELL [9.77WR Athens GP 05] & Justin GATLIN [9.77=WR Doha GP 06]

Fastest ever recorded ‘legal’ Reaction Time: 0.100, Jon Drummond [Monaco GP 1993]

Total [Without Drummond's Perfect 0.100RT]: 9.45

Total [With Drummonds Perfect 0.100RT]: 9.55

Official Split-times:
*Ray Stewart 1.69 0-10m Minus RT
*Ben Johnson 1.69 0-10m Minus RT, 1.00 10-20m & 0.84 40-50m DQ
*Carl Lewis 0.84 40-50m, 0.83 70-80m, 0.85 80-90m & 0.85 90-100m

Video-Analysis Split-times:
pierrejean analysis
*Asafa Powell 0.85 80-90m & 0.85 90-100m
*Tim Montgomery 0.84 40-50m & 0.85 90-100m

My analysis
*Frankie Fredericks 1.69 0-10m Minus RT & 0.84 40-50m

*Maurice Greene 1.69 0-10m Minus RT, 1.00 10-20m, 0.89 20-30m, 0.84 40-50m, 0.82 50-60m, 0.83 60-70m, 0.83 70-80m, 0.85 80-90m & 0.85 90-100m

*Tim Montgomery 1.69 0-10m Minus RT

*Justin Gatlin 0.85 30-40m, 0.85 80-90m & 0.85 90-100m

*Donovan Bailey 0.83 60-70m

*Carl Lewis 0.85 90-100m

Some observations of the above:
- Maurice Greene stands alone as the fastest human at the 50-60m mark, covering 10m in a mere 0.82 seconds.
- Even after all these years, Carl Lewis is still ranked among the fastest 100m finishers in history, equalling the top times for the last 30m of the century race.

Source
hsi.net

A tribute to the greatest line and scene in Malaysian moviemaking history

Both are from the movie Ibu Mertuaku (My Mother-in-Law), a 1962 film directed by and starring Malaysian silver-screen legend, the late Tan Sri P. Ramlee. The plot revolves around a tragic love affair between Kassim Selamat (played by P Ramlee), a poor musician, and Sabariah (played by Sarimah), the only daughter of Nyonya Mansoor, a wealthy matriarch (played by Mak Dara). The movie starts out as a light-hearted romantic comedy, but during the last half hour turns into a dramatic tragedy.

This film is one of the greatest Malaysian film ever made, containing many evergreen songs and the infamous eye-stabbing-with-forks scene, which has been censored in later editions.

ibu-mertuaku-mak-dara.jpg

Mak Dara (1907-1970), playing Nyonya Mansoor, the mother in law from hell delivers a flawless performance and steals the show in every scene she’s in. Later, she recalled in various documentaries that upon the release of the film, the impact of her performance was such that random people would stop her in the streets to berate or spit on her.

Here, she utters the immortal line(s):

Click to see the movie clip

27th August 1965: the one and only time The Beatles met Elvis Presley

The Beatles visited Elvis Presley at his home in Bel Air, Los Angeles on Friday, 27th August 1965 during their second US tour. The visit lasted 4 hours during which time they talked, joked and listened to music. They even had an impromptu jam session, unfortunately nobody thought of recording that!

Members of The Beatles told of their experiences in the book The Beatles Anthology. Some selected comments:

John: It was very exciting, we were all nervous as hell.

Ringo: I was pretty excited. We walked in, and Elvis was sitting down on a settee in front of the TV. He was playing a bass guitar, which even to this day I find very strange. He had all his guys around him, and we said, “Hi, Elvis.” He was pretty shy, and we were a little shy, but between the five of us we kept it rolling. I felt I was more thrilled to meet him than he was to meet me.

Paul: He showed us in. I mean it was Elvis. He just looked like Elvis - we were all major fans, so it was hero worship of a high degree. He said, “Hello, lads - do you want a drink?”

John: He had his TV going all the time. In front of the TV, he had a massive amplifier with a bass plugged into it, and he was up playing bass all the time with the picture up on the TV. So we just got in there and played with him. We all plugged in whatever was around, and we played and sang.

Paul: That was the greatest. Elvis was into the bass, So there I was, “Well, let me show you a thing or two, El…” Suddenly he was a mate. It was a great conversation piece for me. I could actually talk about the bass, and we sat around and just enjoyed ourselves. He was great - talkative and friendly and a little bit shy. But that was his image. We expected that, we hoped for that.

John: It was nice meeting Elvis. He was just Elvis, you know? He seemed normal to us. We never talked about anything else - we just played music. He wasn’t bigger than us, but he was “the thing.” He just wasn’t articulate, that’s all.

Paul: It was one of the great meetings of my life. I think he liked us. I think at that time, he may have felt a little bit threatened, but he didn’t say anything. We certainly didn’t feel any antagonism.I only met him that once, and then I think the success of our career started to push him out a little, which we were very sad about, because we wanted to coexist with him.

From another source, John Lennon’s account is reproduced here in its entirety:

We’d tried to meet Elvis during our first tour of the States in 1964, but couldn’t make it because of his commitments and ours. But when we came in the summer of 1965 we found we’d be in Hollywood at the same time Elvis was filming there.

And that’s how we met Elvis on the night of Friday, August 27, 1965. It still took three days of planning to set up the get together in Elvis’s house–which we hoped would be a secret. But the fans and the press still got wind of it and were there in their hundreds trying to get in, and although we were used to crowds, the thought of Elvis and the Beatles being together at one time just blew the minds of some of the people.

(more…)

The world’s most controversial Elvis Presley impersonator / tribute artist

Elvis Herselvis (real name Leigh Crow), a self-confessed lesbian, is the world’s most controversial Elvis impersonator.

According to wikipedia:

(more…)

How many Elvis Presley impersonators are out there?

We’ll never know for sure how many Elvis tribute artists are in the world, but experts reckon that the number has not reduced, but rather has reached an all-time high.

According to The Naked Scientist in December 2000, “There are now at least 85,000 Elvis’s around the world, compared to only 170 in 1977 when Elvis died. At this rate of growth, experts predict that by 2019 Elvis impersonators will make up a third of the world population.”

Well, I guess 2 billion Elves (not Elvi) won’t do any harm.

The world’s best Elvis impersonator / tribute artist

Shawn Klush, of Pittston, Pennsylvania was on 17th August 2007 named the Ultimate Elvis Tribute Artist, in the first-ever competition officially sanctioned by Elvis Presley’s estate to see who is the best Elvis impersonator in the world.

Wearing a replica of Elvis’s 70s era white jumpsuit, Klush captured the imagination of the sell-out crowd at a Memphis concert hall with 2 songs: “Viva Las Vegas” and “You Gave Me A Mountain.”

He defeated 9 other hopefuls, including veterans Trent Carlini and Donny Edwards. In a true indication of Elvis’s enduring international appeal, the finalists included a Canadian, a Norwegian and an Englishman.

It was not an SMS concert, but rather judged by a panel, which included Joe Moscheo, a vocalist who performed regularly with Elvis in Las Vegas. Contestants were judged on performance, appearance and “respect for Elvis.”

The cash prize of USD5,000 might not seem much, but the marketing value of the first-ever endorsement from Presley’s estate could prove to be priceless.

Preliminary rounds of the competition took on an American Idol-esque quality as regional contests were held to find the 10 finalists.

Source
Yahoo News

The world’s most controversial films

Filmsite.org has listed the most controversial films of all time, films that “have the ability to anger us, divide us, shock us, disgust us, and more. Usually, films that inspire controversy, outright boycotting, picketing, banning, censorship, or protest have graphic sex, violence, homosexuality, religious, political or race-related themes and content. They usually push the envelope regarding what can be filmed and displayed on the screen, and are considered taboo, “immoral” or “obscene” due to language, drug use, violence and sensuality/nudity or other incendiary elements. Inevitably, controversy helps to publicize these films and fuel the box-office receipts.”

The list includes Entertainment Weekly’s June 16, 2006 issue which contained a listing of their top 25 “Most Controversial Movies of All-Time” and more.

What I have included in the following is the list of films that I’ve seen myself, and was mesmerised, and indeed shocked on at least the first viewing:

Blue Velvet (1986): an original look at sex, violence, crime and power under the peaceful exterior of small-town Americana in the mid-80s. Beneath the familiar, peaceful, ‘American-dream’ cleanliness of the daytime scenes lurked sleaziness, prostitution, unrestrained violence, and perversity - powerful and potentially-dangerous sexual forces that might be unleashed if not contained.

It was considered controversial, shocking, and lurid when released. The compelling film was often criticized for its depiction of aberrant sexual behavior, as well as highly ridiculed and disdained as an extreme, dark, vulgar and disgusting film, especially for its cinematic treatment of Isabella Rossellini - director Lynch’s wife at the time.

Its most repulsive scene was the one in which clean-cut, all-American boy/trekker Jeffrey Beaumont (Kyle MacLachlan) first voyeuristically watched the fragile nightclub singer named Dorothy (Isabella Rossellini) from her closet — when she discovered him, she forced him to strip at knifepoint and fondled him — but they were interrupted by the entry of a monstrous, loathsome, nitrous-oxide sniffing kidnapper - the evil, vile and depraved drug-pusher psycho Frank (Dennis Hopper). Beaumont witnessed the sexually-depraved, blackmailing relationship between the abused/brutalized, sado-machochistic mother and Frank - who used an oxygen inhaler while terrorizing and raping Dorothy as he play-acted being both her Daddy and Baby (”Baby wants to f–k”). After Frank left the scene of victimization, Dorothy pleaded with a consoling Beaumont to further abuse her: “Feel me. Hit me.” Later in the film in a scene considered gratuitous and personally degrading, a vulnerable Dorothy appeared naked and battered on the Beaumont’s front lawn.

Cannibal Holocaust (1985): This extremely graphic, hotly-debated cult classic Italian film - the uncredited inspirational precursor of the faux-documentary The Blair Witch Project - was filled with violent, grisly, and disturbing images. The exploitation film was purportedly the story of a film crew, led by Alan Yates (Gabriel York), that disappeared while making a documentary (a feature entitled “The Green Inferno” about the last surviving tribes that still practiced cannibalism) in the wilds of South America’s Amazon area. Masterful cinematic tricks and special effects created an unnerving view of the fate of the team - found in undeveloped film cans by a search and rescue team.

Grisly, realistic-looking scenes included a woman impaled on a pole, a castration, some beatings with large hammers, guts-eating, a forced abortion, numerous animal slaughterings (including a horrible turtle murder), and gang-rape.

For his work on the film, the director was arrested by Italian authorities on suspicion of murder charges and faced life in prison, following its 1980 Milan premiere. He endured a trial when Italian authorities were unconvinced that the footage was indeed staged. Deodato lost the original trial, and all prints were to be destroyed, but he managed to have the ruling overturned in the early ’80s when the actors finally appeared on TV to prove otherwise. Some five years passed before the film saw release in Deodato’s home country. This movie was banned for twenty years in certain countries, including the UK.

Citizen Kane (1941): This widely-acclaimed film from debut film director/actor Orson Welles (24 years old) is usually regarded as the greatest film ever made. The film, budgeted at $800,000, received unanimous critical praise even at the time of its release, although it was not a commercial success (partly due to its limited distribution and delayed release by RKO due to pressure exerted by famous publisher W.R. Hearst).

The film engendered controversy (and efforts at suppression in early 1941 through intimidation, blackmail, newspaper smears, discrediting and FBI investigations) before it premiered in New York City on May 1, 1941, because it appeared to fictionalize and caricaturize certain events and individuals in the life of William Randolph Hearst - a powerful newspaper magnate and publisher. The film was accused of drawing remarkable, unflattering, and uncomplimentary parallels (especially in regards to the Susan Alexander Kane character) to real-life. The notorious battle was detailed in Thomas Lennon’s and Michael Epstein’s Oscar-nominated documentary The Battle Over Citizen Kane (1996), and it was retold in HBO’s cable-TV film RKO 281 (1999) (the film’s title referred to the project numbering for the film by the studio, before the film was formally titled).

The gossip columnist Louella Parsons persuaded her newspaper boss Hearst that he was being slandered by RKO and Orson Welles’ film when it was first previewed, so the Hearst-owned newspapers (and other media outlets) pressured theatres to boycott the film and also threatened libel lawsuits. Hearst also ordered his publications to completely ignore the film, and not accept advertising for other RKO projects.

A Clockwork Orange (1971, UK): At the time, Stanley Kubrick’s randomly ultra-violent, over-indulgent, graphically-stylized film of the near future - and most controversial film - was one of only two movies rated X on its original release (the other was Midnight Cowboy (1969)) that was nominated for a Best Picture Academy Award. The film was hotly debated when it was released - both highly praised and objectionable for its bleak outlook, and for its pairing of comedy with violence.

The dystopic film about fascist social conditioning and free will was heavily criticized and opposed by religious groups for its sexual and violent content. Feminists were outraged with some of the misogynistic images - such as the obscene female poses of the supine furniture in the Korova bar. Makes for interesting office furniture? Then, of course there was the the prolonged rape of a big-breasted woman, a gigantic penis sculpture being used as a murder weapon on the Cat Lady, and a view of the protagonist’s snake gliding toward a woman’s vagina.

The most infamous was the rape scene of Mrs. Alexander (Adrienne Corri) in her opulent house, Alex’s (Malcolm McDowell) gang of droogs (Pete, Georgie, and Dim) who were wearing masks with comical noses. After cutting away her skin-tight red jumpsuit Alex delivered horribly vicious blows of his boots to Mr. Alexander’s (Patrick Magee) mid-section — timed rhythmically to his singing of Gene Kelly’s tune “Singin’ in the Rain”. In a later scene, Alex was subjected to corrective treatment — experimental aversion therapy imposed by the state in which he was behavioristically conditioned (with his eyes clamped wide-open in order to view scenes of violence in films while drugged to induce nausea and forced to listen to his beloved Beethoven) to suppress his violent and sexual drives - and in the process gave up his own individual and personal rights.

Because of the copy-cat violence (some gangs dressed as droogs sang “Singin’ in the Rain” as they carried on violently) that the film was blamed for by the media and courts, Kubrick withdrew it from circulation in Britain about a year after its release. Some believed it was because it was rumored that Kubrick and his family had received death threats. It wasn’t officially available there again - in theaters or on video - until 2000, a year after his death.

The Deer Hunter (1978): Storywriter/producer/director Michael Cimino’s epic about war and friendship was a powerful, disturbing and compelling look at the Vietnam War through the lives of three blue-collar, Russian-American friends in a small Pennsylvania steel-mill town before, during, and after their service in the war.

Although a Best Picture Oscar-winner, the meandering, sometimes shrill, raw film was extremely controversial on many accounts - political, historical and emotional. The flawed, extravagantly-expensive film was often pretentious, ambiguous, overwrought and excessive, and loosely edited, with under-developed character portrayals and unsophisticated, careless film techniques. Critics argued that the film grossly distorted historical fact.

The most talked about sequences were the contrived, theatrical, and fictional Russian Roulette tortures, imposed twice in the narrative - on the American POW’s during wartime, and played as a game in a Vietnamese gambling den. [However, there were no documented cases or historical reports of the deadly game in actuality.] Historically inaccurate or not, the fabricated scene of a Vietcong atrocity metaphorically depicted the brutal absurdity of the war. Director Cimino was also criticized as distortedly and one-sidedly portraying all the Asian characters in the film as despicable, sadistic racists and killers. He countered by arguing that his film was not political, polemical, literally accurate, or posturing for any particular point of view.

The Exorcist (1973): The director adapted William Peter Blatty’s best-selling, 1971 blockbuster book about satanic demon possession (based on a true-story of a 13 year-old Maryland boy in 1949), and created one of the most disturbing, frightening, shocking, and exploitative films ever made. The horror film masterpiece, the first major horror blockbuster, was one of the most opposed and talked-about films, especially during its pre-release time period. Viewers and the studio took note that there were accompanying ominous events, including the deaths of nine persons associated with the production (including Jack MacGowran and von Sydow’s brother) - and a request was made to exorcise the set.

Its controversial content, sensational, nauseating, and horrendous special effects (360 degree head-rotations, self-mutilation/masturbation with a crucifix, the projectile spewing of green puke, a mixture of split-pea soup and oatmeal, etc.), for its depictions of desecrations, vivid representations of evil, and for its intense scenes of exorcism (accompanied by blasphemies, obscenities and graphic physical shocks). One of the most controversial scenes was the long sequence of invasive medical testing performed on the hapless patient - criticized as medical pornography.

A sweet pre-teenaged girl Regan MacNeil (Linda Blair) became possessed by a malevolent evil spirit - and after urinating on the carpet in public and experiencing a shaking bed, was soon transformed and disfigured into a head-rotating, levitating, green vomit-spewing, obscenity-shouting creature. Her divorced, film-star mother Chris MacNeil (Ellen Burstyn) was at wit’s end, until she called on a dedicated, faith-questioning Jesuit priest Father Karras (Jason Miller) to exorcise the malevolent devil from her daughter’s body. An elderly priest Father Merrin (Max von Sydow), whose archaeology project released the Satanic being, also risked his life (and died of heart failure) to administer rites of exorcism with incantations and holy water.

The film was enormously popular with moviegoers at Christmas-time of 1973, but some portions of the viewing audience fled from theaters due to nausea, convulsions, fainting or sheer fright/anger (Headlines proclaimed: “The Exorcist nearly killed me!”), and it was reported that one patron in San Francisco literally attacked the screen in an attempt to kill the demon. Mass hysteria led to paramedics being called to some theatres, and others were picketed in protest.

The film’s showings also led to a reported increase in temporary spiritual possessions or psychoses by individuals, and an increase in requests for priests to exorcise everything from loved ones and pets to houses, neighborhoods and appliances. Evangelist Reverend Billy Graham stated that he “felt the power of evil buried within the celluloid of the film itself”. The film was also banned on video in the UK for fifteen years.

Fahrenheit 9/11 (2004): Michael Moore’s controversial ‘documentary’ film was a critical expose and scathing indictment of the George W. Bush presidency and administration for its handling of the terrorist crisis and his alleged connections to Al-Qaeda leader Bin Laden’s family. It was accused of being propagandistic - especially in an election year - and that it contained half-truths and distortions of facts, and some conservative groups called for theaters to not screen it.

The documentary film was included among the Cannes Film Festival’s main competition (only the second time in 48 years for a documentary) - and won the top prize called the Palme D’or - the first for a documentary in nearly 50 years. It also broke the record for highest opening-weekend earnings in the US for a documentary, and established a significant precedent for a political documentary (eventually earning $119 million) as the highest-grossing, non-concert, non-IMAX documentary film of all time.

The controversial film had earlier gained further publicity and notoriety when Disney opted not to distribute the film through its Miramax subsidiary unit, and Moore accused the company of censorship. Disney’s refusal to let Miramax release it, because it would risk causing a partisan battle and alienate customers, actually contributed to the film’s great success. [Supposedly, Disney also feared the film might endanger tax breaks Disney received in Florida where its theme parks were located, and where the president's brother, Jeb Bush, was governor at the time.] Although the film was rated R, under protest from filmmaker Moore, some theaters defied the rating and allowed teenagers (without guardians) to attend.

Memorable images include Bush’s continued reading of the children’s book “My Pet Goat” in a Florida elementary school after the first plane crashed into the World Trade Center (filmmaker Michael Moore narrated: “When informed of the first plane hitting the World Trade Center, where terrorists had struck just eight years prior, Mr. Bush decided to go ahead with his photo opportunity…”), the many self-incriminating Bush clips (such as when he demonstrated his golf swing - “Now watch this drive!” - immediately after calling on nations to stop terrorist killers, his stumbling through speeches and delivering such damning lines as: “What an impressive crowd: the haves, and the have-mores. Some people call you the elite, I call you my base”); the documentarian’s questioning of Democratic and Republican politicians about enrolling their sons for military duty; the mall scenes in which Marine recruiters targeted minority teenagers for enrollment, and Bush’s inept handling of the terrorist crisis and his agenda (after 9/11) to illegitimately launch a pre-emptive war in Afghanistan and Iraq.

Last Tango In Paris (1972, It./Fr.): Bernardo Bertolucci’s film was a landmark, controversial erotic film with raw (yet simulated) sexual scenes and primitive force - critics and audiences alike asked - was it erotic art or pornography? In the film’s story, a distraught, confused, grieving widower and middle-aged, overweight American exile Paul (Marlon Brando) plunged into a sado-masochistic, physical (yet impersonal and basically anonymous) relationship with young, big-breasted 20 year-old Parisienne ingenue Jeanne (Maria Schneider). Paul’s gutter-language and set of ‘no questions asked’ rules was notable for the time: “We are going to forget everything we knew - everything” - and their relationship became increasingly more vile, slavish, empty, humiliating, and unromantic (i.e., “You know in 15 years, you’re going to be playing soccer with your tits. What do you think of that?”).

It was noted for Paul’s scatological monologues, its bathtub washing scene and the disturbing and explicit ‘butter’ scene during anal intercourse, in which she passively acquiesced to rape and forced sodomy (with an application of butter: “Get the butter”) in an empty, rented apartment, as he forced her to repeat phrases such as: “the will is broken by repression”. Later, Paul reciprocated by letting Jeanne penetrate him anally with her fingers - part of his objective to “look death right in the face…go right up into the ass of death… till you find the womb of fear.” By film’s end, she had shot him with her father’s gun, and confessed to police: “I don’t know who he is” and “I don’t know his name”.

It was noteworthy as the first “mainstream” film to carry the dreaded “X” rating. In 1974, it became the first film to be prosecuted under Britain’s Obscene Publications Act - and the sodomy scene was ordered deleted. In the director’s own country, the film was seized and banned, and charged for its “obscene content offensive to public decency”. In the mid-70s, it was permanently banned in Italy (with all prints seized), its stars and director were condemned, and Bertolucci was given a 4-month suspended prison sentence.

The Passion Of The Christ (2004): Co-producer, co-writer, and director Mel Gibson’s R-rated, self-financed, independent smash-hit film, a brutal depiction of Jesus’ last 12 hours on Earth, stirred up considerable controversy. It was filmed with dialogue in three languages (Aramaic, Hebrew, and Latin) with subtitles, and although Gibson claimed that the account was authentic and ‘truthful’ - it would be nearly impossible to derive a strict and true historical account of the events from the Gospels. The scourging (a 10-minute sequence) and crucifixion scenes in particular were overpoweringly graphic, bloody, torturous and vicious. Even Gibson admitted that the film was deliberately “shocking” and “extreme” in order to depict Jesus’ enormous sacrifice.

Even before it was released and viewed, religious leaders were indignant over its Catholic-tinged interpretation of the Bible, its use of extra-Biblical sources, and its poetic license, and Jews protested the film as anti-Semitic - believing that the “obscene” film would blame Jews for the death of Jesus. Even Gibson had difficulty securing a distributor for his film.

The film went on to be one of the most successful R-rated films ever, with $370 million US box-office receipts, mostly due to its embracing by evangelical church groups. An unrated, re-edited re-release of the film (still R-rated), named The Passion Recut (2005), with Gibson’s own edits (removal of about 5 minutes of graphic violence) was shown in theatres for a short time a year later.

Source
http://www.filmsite.org/controversialfilms1.html

26th June 1977: The last Elvis Presley live concert

It happened on the evening of 26th June 1977 at Market Square Arena, Indianapolis. 18,000 fans were in the audience.

The set list is:

- Also Sprach Zarathustra [The theme from the movie 2001: A Space Odyssey. This is Elvis' usual entrance theme. This theme has been used by several others, possibly most famously by Ric Flair, the WWE wrestler]
- See See Rider
- I Got A Woman/Amen
- Love Me
- Fairytale
- You Gave Me A Mountain
- Jailhouse Rock
- It’s Now Or Never
- Little Sister
- TeddyBear/Don’t Be Cruel
- Please Release Me
- I Can’t Stop Loving You
- Bridge Over Troubled Water
- [band introductions]
- Early Morning Rain
- What’d I Say
- Johnny B. Goode
- I Really Don’t Want To Know
- Hurt
- Hound dog
- Can’t Help Falling In Love
- Closing vamp

Pictures from that concert, courtesy of elvis-in-concert.com:

Click for more pictures, videos and the concert review

The worst editing in a commercial movie ever

Some movies are done only for the fun of it. Hence, amateurish mistakes are common. But others are of a totally different category - they are done to be sold and to gain profit; they are commercial products. That means, as consumers, we have certain expectations to its quality.

Hence, I’d like to read what you have to say about this particular scene of a local (Sabah, Malaysia) movie entitled “Jovitah” produced in 2004. It has the worst editing in a movie I have ever seen.

The bottom line is, would you buy it?

Click to see the video extract

The world’s funniest movie scenes: part 4: The Nutty Professor: the Klumps family dinner with Carla

Eddie Murphy plays multiple characters in one of the most hilarious dinnertime scenes in movie history in The Nutty Professor (1996), where all social taboos are broken in a mere few minutes. The dialogue is fast and furious, so here’s a transcript of that particular scene courtesy of script-o-rama:

- There’s nothing Iike being with family!
I am hungry. Come on now.
- Carla, where are you from? - Chicago.
- Oh, Chicago! We have family there. - Windy City, huh?
I was workin’ on a skyscraper in Chicago once and my lunch blew off the 7th fIoor.
Yeah, I figure your fat ass would remember somebody’s sandwich flyin’ off a building.
- Oh, baby, eat some bread.
Miss Purty, are you and Sherman havin’ relations?
- That’s a good question. - Uh, no, Grandma.
It’s not like - like that. We’re colleagues.
- Oh. - We just work together.
That’s how it start out - colleagues.
Me and your grandfather were colleagues. Next thing you know he’s on top of me in the shed, pumpin’ and a-sweatin’.
- It’s not like that. - Will you hush up?
You never brought a girl home. The least you can do is let us talk to her.
Yeah, I’d like to get to know her a little better myself.
Ain’t nothing wrong with havin’ relations. Don’t be ashamed of that.
Relations is beautiful. When I was young I used to always have relations. Every night, if a nice gentleman bring me flowers and candy, take me to a movie, show me a lovely evenin’, then I would take him home and give him hot, lovely relations. Relations is a beautiful thing. It’s nothing to be ashamed of. Especially two young peopIe.
- That blowhole. - Cletus!
- Sometimes when I’m alone, I relate to myself. - I can relate.
- Oh, Mama. - I don’t wanna hear this shit whiIe I’m eatin’.
- Cletus! - I’m gonna kill you later.
- Carla, do you like children? - Yes. Oh, that’s wonderful.
I can’t wait for Sherman to bring me home some grandbabies. I know you’re gonna enjoy making them babies. Got those childbearing hips.
- Baby’ll pop right out.
Your family got any money? I ain’t payin’ for no big-ass wedding.
I know a wonderfuI minister. What religious background are you?
I still got my wedding dress. If you want it, I’ll take it in. You’d look so lovely in it. It’s white, though. Can you wear a white wedding dress, young lady? Now, Sherman, you can wear a white tuxedo. ‘Cause you know Sherman - Sherman has never had relations.
Mama, you gonna embarrass my baby.
- I hope you got a strong back. - Oh, look at my baby blushin’.
When you get all that man, and release all that that’s been built up… for years - Just wantin’ and wantin’ and wantin’! Whoo! Might make your head blow off.
Pop goes the weasel!
I got my own self hot tellin’ that story.
Pop goes the weasel, ’cause the weasel say “”pop”"!
You gonna get married here or in Chicago?
Do you cook? ‘Cause somebody’s got to feed my Sherman.
Yeah, I know a wonderful church down there on Main Street, but they won’t marry you if you’re a lesbian.
Not that I have anything against lesbians. I love lesbians.
- Lesbians is cooI. - There’s nothing wrong with a little bingo. A little cunnilingus ain’t never hurt nobody.
- Why is it the woman always gets the choice where they’re gonna be married? - Tradition.
Tradition, my ass! I ain’t gonna pay for everybody flyin’ to no Chicago!
- You know how much plane tickets cost? - You cheap bastard.
We’re gonna have to drive down there.
I’m not driving over to Chicago.
* Sherman gonna have relations *
- My baby’s not gettin’ married-
There you go again, poppin’ off gas in front of this lovely young lady.
We’re trying to have a meal. Put that brake on this gas.
I hope your ass turn into a frog.
- Don’t nobody want to hear your flatulence, Cletus Klump.
You’re such a disgrace!
- I stopped hoIding my gas a long time ago. - You spoiled the dinner!
- Say one more word-

Watch the video

The world’s ugliest fish

The title of the world’s ugliest fish is a toss between 2 contenders.

First up is Lasiognathus Saccostoma, which has been called “a grotesque among grotesques” and “has an overbite to end all overbites.” It’s surprisingly small, only 3 inches long. Nature has equipped it with a fishing rod, complete with lure and three bony hooks! Its precise function is as yet unknown, but undersea explorer William Beebe was reported to have said way back in 1930 that “it might be cast swiftly ahead, when the hooks and lights would so frighten any pursued fish that they would hesitate long enough to be engulfed in the onrushing maw.”

The other contender is Himantolophus Groenlandicus or footballfish, which has been described as having a face “only a mother could love.” It is apparently the first deep-sea angler ever found - that was back in 1833 at 22 inches long - still the largest on record. As with the other fish, this one also has some kind of “fishing rod” contraption built-in.

Click to see its picture

The world’s strangest animals

I think there’s no contest here: they are all deep sea animals. But as to which one is the strangest / most bizarre, you’d have several choices.

Up first is the deep sea giant sea spider, which lives more than a mile deep in the Pacific. It is nearly a foot across.

Then there is the deep sea glass squid, which lives off New Zealand.

Next up, the one and only viperfish. It has lower fangs so long that “they don’t even fit in its mouth, but rather project back dangerously close to the eyes.”

Next up, the “Saccopharynx lavenbergi” (The gulper).

Apparently these “can reach six feet in length, have rows of sharp little teeth, and, like pythons of the deep, can swallow prey much fatter than themselves. They down victims whole, of course, which is why they’re called gulpers.”

Sources
exploretheabyss.com
pbs.org
extremescience.com
who-sucks.com

Athletics: the greatest long jump competition in history

Surely that would be during the 1991 IAAF World Championships in Athletics held in Tokyo, Japan.

Until now, the whole championships, and possibly the whole of athletics history, is best remembered for the men’s long jump competition, when Carl Lewis made the best six-jump series in history, only to be beaten by Mike Powell, whose 8.95 m jump broke Bob Beamon’s 23-year-old world record set at the 1968 Mexico Olympics.

lewis-1991-wc-longjump.jpg

Powell was Lewis’s main rival of the last few years, finishing second behind him at the 1988 Olympics. In 1990, Powell was the world’s top-ranked long jumper, but until that August night Lewis had not lost a long jump competition in 10 years, winning 65 consecutive competitions. Every time they met, Powell was unable to beat Lewis, usually fouling his best jumps.

This is a log of the 1991 competition. Powell jumped first. The conditions were hot and humid, and there was a strange swirling wind, hardly ideal conditions to beat Beamon’s record, but the truth would soon be revealed.

1st jump:
Powell: foul.
Lewis: 8.68 m (a World Championships record - a mark bettered by only 3 other persons in history).

2nd jump:
Powell: 8.54 m (now in silver medal position)
Lewis: [unknown]

3rd jump:
Powell: [unknown]
Lewis: 8.83 m (wind-aided. This jump would have won every long jump competition in history except two, but even this would turn out to be not enough to win. It was Lewis’ best jump ever at that time, but incredibly, later in the evening he would better this mark.)

4th jump:
Powell: jumped a long foul, estimated to be around 8.80 m.
Lewis: 8.91 m (wind-aided, so it could not be considered a world record, but would still count in the competition. That meant Lewis had exceeded Beamon’s “immortal” 8.90 m world record with the greatest leap ever under all conditions, at that time of course.)

5th jump:
Powell: 8.95 m (The crowd exploded when the distance was revealed, a new world record, surpassing Beamon’s 23-year-old mark. Note that Lewis still had 2 more jumps to try to top this. David Culbert, an Australian competitor (he finished 6th at 8.02 m) had this to say:

I was sitting next to Powell throughout the competition, calming him down after a massive round four foul and telling him bluntly to sit down and chill out after he wildly celebrated his world record. “Mate, Carl has still got two more jumps. You’d better settle down because he might jump 9.10m and you’ll need to respond,” or words to that effect. By the horrified look on Mike’s face, he realised I wasn’t joking. Though Lewis deserved to break the world record and take the victory, it would have consigned Powell to athletics trivia had he been out jumped in the final two rounds. Lewis produced two more stunning jumps, an incredible 8.87m followed by 8.84m in the last two rounds as he searched in vain for the extra few centimetres that would elevate him to victory. On Lewis’ final jump, Powell lay on the ground - head in his hands, unable to watch. Once the result was semaphored, he rose to his feet and surrounded by the press pack congratulated Lewis. After my final jump he embraced me. “Thanks mate,” he said in his LA drawl.

Lewis: 8.87 m (I remembered the intensity in Lewis’s face as he concentrated on doing this 5th jump, a few minutes after Powell destroyed a record deemed unbreakable. He was, suddenly, not chasing Beamon anymore, but rather Powell! This jump is his new personal best under legal wind conditions, in fact he was jumping *against* the wind!)

6th (and final) jump:
Powell: [unknown]
Lewis: 8.84 m (To Lewis’ credit, despite the incredible pressure of having to beat a world record which had just been set, he still achieved the 3rd and 5th greatest legal long jumps in history [the 2nd and 3rd longest at low altitude, behind only Powell’s record]).

Powell said later:

“I timed it. It was five minutes and 31 seconds from the time [Lewis] walked onto the runway to the time he jumped. My heart was beating very quickly. I started to feel faint. I hoped not, but deep down, I thought he would beat me.”

Not that time. Then Powell was off, running down the infield leaping and whooping and hugging the official who had red-flagged him on an earlier huge leap.

To put it in perspective, Lewis had performed the greatest series of jumps in history (4 jumps over 8.80 m) even besting the old world record with a wind-aided jump, but *still* lost the competition.

More than 15 years later Powell’s record still stands, while Lewis’ legal jumps rank as 3rd and 5th all-time.

Powell and Lewis never jumped so far during the rest of their careers again.

The competition was so intense that they refused to do a joint press conference afterwards. Later, Lewis was grudging in his comment of Powell’s achievement: “He just did it. It was that close, and it was the best of his life, and he may never do it again.”

Bronze medalist Larry Myricks was left almost half a metre behind, at 8.42.

The standard set is so high that the best jump ever made (as of 2nd June 2007) since then is a mere 8.74 m by Erick Walder in April 1994. Further, the best jump of the 21st century so far is even shorter: 8.66 m by Louis Tsatoumas (Greece) in June 2007, which stands at no.8 on the all-time list of performers. All the top 7 jumpers set their best mark in 1995 or earlier.

Powell’s initial reaction was one of utter disbelief, and ended with a smile and shake of the head. His future jumps never approached such incredible distances again. The next year, at the 1992 Olympics, Powell and Lewis dueled again. It was still a close fight, with Lewis this time edging Powell 8.67 - 8.64.

At the 1993 World Championships Powell won gold again but at the relatively short distance of 8.59 m, while silver medalist Stanislav Tarasenko’s (Russia) best jump is only 8.16 m. At the 1995 World Championships, Powell only won bronze with 8.29. That event was won by Ivan Pedroso at 8.70 m, still well behind the standard set 4 years earlier.

Watch the video