Web worldrec.info

Probably the world’s most expensive Valentine’s Day dinner

Update 14 February 2012

For the 2012 edition, the price has gone down a bit. It’s “only” SGD9,999+ (> RM24,000) per couple this time, as compared to SGD15,000 per couple 3 years back.

Official Program:

Swissôtel The Stamford’s Helipad Soirée:

- 12-course set dinner by Chef Julien Royer with 2 bottles of Dom Pérignon Champagne
- Bouquet of 99 roses
- Jewellery set with diamond necklace, a pair of earrings and bracelet worth $5,300
- One-night’s stay at Executive Club Room
- 120-minute Couple Spa Treatment at Willow Stream Spa
- Limousine transfers to and from the hotel

In the event of bad weather, dinner will be served at an Equinox private dining room located on level 69

——————————–
10 February 2009

For SGD15,000 (around RM37,000 or USD10,000) on 14th February 2009 you and partner will have the most extravagant Valentine’s Dinner ever, never mind the recession.

Limited to 20 couples.

What you get:
- privilege of dining on the helipad of Swissotel at the Stamford, the tallest hotel in Singapore at 73-storeys
- 9 course French dinner with Dom Perignon champagne (cost SGD6,000)
- a SGD9,000 diamond studded Valentino watch

This is a video of what the place looks like:

YouTube Preview Image

Source
Today Online, 7 Feb 2009

Popularity: 1% [?]


Related posts

  • Quite possibly the world’s biggest steamboat dinner table
  • Probably the world’s worst place to celebrate Valentine’s Day
  • The world’s most expensive pacifier
  • The world’s most expensive home to cost RM600 million
  • Damien Hirst is now one of the most successful artists of all time
  • RSS feed | Trackback URI

    Comments »

    No comments yet.

    Name (required)
    E-mail (required - never shown publicly)
    URI

    Subscribe to comments via email
    Your Comment (smaller size | larger size)
    You may use <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> in your comment.